I didn't know I had another round, Mr. Chair. My, you're kind at this committee.
Just to come back to one of the questions Mr. Allen raised....
I've been on some of those operations in New Brunswick, too, Mike. They do create a lot of jobs, but I would caution us to think that there will be bays and areas where open-pen aquaculture may make sense and some others where it may not. St. Mary's Bay may be just one such place. I think the key question there is what the presenters, I think, were responding to. Do you put at risk the jobs that are in the lobster fishery and the spin-off jobs from that industry for part-time jobs—basically what you're saying are lower-paid, seasonal, part-time jobs—in the open-pen fishery in that bay? That seems to be what you're saying.
I come back to what I said before. I am shocked that somebody hasn't done the science here. I believe, Mr. Kamp, in the beginning you kind of indicated that we can't question the hearing process. I think the presenters basically are of the opinion that the hearing process wasn't balanced and wasn't fair.
I guess my question would be, how do you make that fair? This was the same problem 10 years ago when we were raising these questions with DFO. How do you get them to accept their responsibility in terms of policing and protecting the wild fishery?
Any comments?