I have a couple points of clarification. The Swift Aquaculture site isn't a recirculating aquaculture system, to start with. It's a flow-through system, like any other trout farm in the province. Basically, licensing of that facility didn't really change much. We issued an aquaculture licence for a site that was on private land, and discharge permits. A similar sort of licence was issued from Fisheries and Oceans under the Fisheries Act, which has very similar conditions of licence attached to it.
It's possible that the conditions of licence may be less specific for discharge. I don't know, I haven't seen that particular licence. There's another thing that was lost, which is kind of significant and gets overlooked. I had mentioned earlier the Farm Practices Protection (Right to Farm) Act. Essentially what that did for farmers in the province was it protected them from nuisance lawsuits. We don't have similar federal legislation to do that. So if you want to develop a closed containment site in an area that could be in a rural area but it might also have a nice park nearby or it might have some very scenic properties, and you want to build a fairly large closed containment site, someone could just complain and say that it's a big cement box that's too noisy and they don't want it there. So the Farm Practices Protection Act would actually protect people from nuisance lawsuits. They no longer have that. That was lost.