Well, it's been a lot of work. I even commend the federal government for achieving what they have over such a short period of time. I don't think there's too much overlap. The industry would say it was going too slowly and could go a lot quicker. I think that will happen in time as people sort out what key issues need to be addressed.
I don't necessarily see any real problems, as long as issues that cause conflict.... I look at some of the regulatory requirements. I raised one issue, for example, with section 36 of the Fisheries Act. If someone's trying to get a licence and wants their licence to give them some sort of standard to discharge to the environment, whether it's a land-based system or an ocean-based system, we have to address the issue where one act says one thing, or the act is interpreted differently by different ministries.
In the Namgis case in particular, this group would like some sort of document that tells them that they can discharge, and they're not in conflict with the Fisheries Act as long as they meet certain standards. But my understanding is they're not getting that because there are some different interpretations of that section of the Fisheries Act.
These issues have been going on for quite a while. Fisheries and Oceans is aware of them, and I believe they're developing legislation to address those issues.