I think we want to come to the question on this. The motion calls for the committee to reaffirm its support, so we would have to have some sort of historical summary of when and in what context this committee has supported these policies. I the motion would require further study for us to say these are policies that still make sense. If 10 years ago the committee supported these in some report, which I'm not sure is the case, then I think we'd have to go and take a look at it and see if that's still the case. I think we're going to have to vote against this motion.
On March 26th, 2012. See this statement in context.