Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Just briefly, and just to clarify, under the new regime, an individual receives an authorization because their projects have the risk of causing serious harm. So they receive the authorization. Attached to it in many cases I guess are conditions of an authorization. The new regime requires by law this person to meet those conditions. So if at some point in this process there is either a person with an authorization that doesn't meet the conditions, or somebody else who causes serious harm, they get charged under the Fisheries Act.
In addition to the judge fining them, and this money now goes into this environmental damages fund, is it true the courts could also require the person to fix the damage they have caused, as well as a fine?