I'll try to answer that.
We feel that the act itself definitely has some problems. It can definitely be improved in certain areas to provide more certainty in, as I mentioned, the definition of aboriginal fisheries and how it applies to some of the historic treaty provisions and promises. We want to ensure that the act itself can be amended so that it provides clarity on these points.
The impacts themselves are pretty great, especially when you look at what we have. We feel that if DFO had engaged first nations sooner and engaged us more effectively, there definitely would have been suggested changes that could have been accommodated.
In and of itself, the act is flawed in some areas. I know the intent is to modernize the fisheries and to improve the old, archaic Fisheries Act. With further engagement, it can be done more appropriately for first nation concerns and accommodate first nation interests. I believe there is an interest on the part of the federal government and also the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to do that, but within the current mechanisms it's just not there.