We do. Some of the science and policy work is going to have to flesh that out. As I said, there is serious harm, permanent alteration, and destruction of habitat. We have a good understanding of what destruction of habitat is. The courts have helped to define it over the years. In the case of permanent alteration, there is an FAO definition, and the science folks are working on a specific application of it. Death of the fish is quite clear.
So there are some policy and regulatory issues that we still need to define in that regard, but we do think there is sufficient direction in the legislation to be able to get going on this.