I'll give you a short answer so I don't get beeped again, because it's actually a very large topic.
Specifically with respect to the species at risk program, the hub of your question, essentially we work very closely with Environment Canada in its role both as Environment Canada, so to speak, and the ministry responsible for parks. So it's really a three departmental thing, even though it's two ministers. Essentially the species at risk program is jointly managed by the three agencies. We are working at a series of levels to make sure that our programs align so that we don't have conflicting regulations, policies, programs, that sort of thing. We've got three programs that we actually administer jointly to transfer funds to project proponents doing work on the ground and on the landscape. Again, it's a single administration for almost three programs, but it's a central administrative hub.
We've got a whole series of things that we do in collaboration with respect to enforcement of the act so that our enforcement officers don't trip over each other. It's a nice urban myth to say I had an enforcement officer from Fisheries one day and Environment another day and CFIA another day and so on. We work very hard to make sure that actually doesn't happen.
I would conclude by saying that kind of experience is actually replicated in quite a number of other domains. Species at risk is arguably the best example of it, but by no means is it the only area where we work closely with other fellow departments to achieve financial savings and program efficiencies.