To perhaps clarify something a little, there's a bit of a difference between a board and the committee. Wildlife management boards, or entities of that type, are established by all the land claims agreements. Those boards provide advice to the minister, who ultimately makes decisions.
Nunavut is special because we've established a cooperation committee with them, but we have mechanisms that are similar with all the boards, for which there are land claims that have established such an organization. Something like northern shrimp or Greenland halibut does become more complex, because you might involve more than one land claim area—for example, Nunavut and Nunavik for shrimp.
We work with both of those partners in establishing a management plan for the area, and special allocations and commercial allocations are fairly finely subdivided. Nunavik and Nunavut do have overlapping claims, and we're waiting for a resolution between those two land claim bodies on the sharing of a resource between the two of them. The minister has determined the overall amount, and he's awaiting advice from the two boards—which will come separately—on the shares that should be allocated between them.
David also mentioned 0A and 0B turbot—you'll have to forgive me for using the numbers and letters, but it's how we manage things. That's Davis Strait and those are stocks that are shared between Canada and Greenland, both turbot and shrimp. For them, Canada and Greenland jointly ask for advice from the NAFO Scientific Council. Although it's not a high seas fishery, it's shared between the two countries. NAFO does provide the service to us as contracting parties. They provide us with scientific advice, and then we unilaterally and separately determine our catch limits.