That's a very good question, and I probably skimmed over it too quickly.
It's really the age demographics. I'll give you an example. I was in the western Arctic, I guess it was last fall, and I was talking with some fishermen. Right now I think we have approximately about a dozen commercial fishers on Great Slave Lake. They're all probably a bit older than I amâmaybe quite a bit older than I am. It's a pretty tough life. Their kids are at that age when they've got the opportunity of continuing in the tradition of the fishery or working in the mines or a resource industry. The reality is that there's just not the uptake. There are other opportunities, through resource development projects or the support for them, where clearly one can make an awful lot more money in an awful lot shorter period of time. As a result of that, we're not getting the uptake.
Now it's a little bit different in the eastern Arctic. I'm not sure why it is, but there are more of the youth who seem to be going down the road of exploring fisheries as an opportunity. We're seeing the same level of resource development projects, so I don't know if it's the community or the geography or what it is.
But we're really struggling, as I said, with only a dozen or so fishers on Great Slave Lake. That's not really going to be a viable fishery, unless some new blood and new growth comes into it, whereas in the eastern Arctic we're seeing a lot of youth showing an interest, so it's much more vibrant.