I think when there's a resource that's available and you have a demand for it, people will come to look for it.
As you say, there is reduced ice coverage. I think it's important to remember that what we read in the media about reduced ice coverage does not mean no ice. There's still a lot of ice. It would not necessarily lend itself to prosecuting a fishery with traditional capture technology. You have to take all that into consideration.
I think the key is, as I've said in my remarks, ensuring you have the science to support it. We're charting new territory here. There's a lot we don't know about it: how fast stocks recover, how long it takes, and where they're coming from. Those kinds of issues would all have to be factored into that.
As I've said, with the information and preliminary data we have so far, particularly in the high western Arctic, it doesn't look viable.