I'll speak to the general piece, and then if Nathan has any comments, he can certainly add to my response.
Part of it is that the productivity in northern lakes is not what you would see in southern jurisdictions. If you have been here, you know that the lakes are not all that productive, in comparison. We have very slow growth rates. The ratio of ice-free versus ice-covered time is significant. So we have lakes that aren't nearly what you are familiar with by way of productivity.
Also, speaking to your second question, I would think that, without its being written in stone.... First of all, the subsistence fishery has priority. That's clear. As for the recreational needs, or the interests of Yukoners in acquiring food or acquiring the opportunity to fish, implicitly a policy has been coming out through the boards and councils, but not written as a formal policy. If you were to analyze all the recommendations and all their input, I would think the outcome you would have would be that recreational fishing would be the second important piece, with commercial being third.