Sure. Thanks for the question.
The idea behind what we conceive of as ecosystem and watershed-based management is that there are a lot of commonalities and similarities among fish species within particular watersheds. For those reasons, managing them as a unit collectively or considering them collectively has some sound biological and scientific basis.
One example that springs to mind is in the Southern Lakes area of Yukon, close to Whitehorse. We have a chain of very large lakes that are connected by short and somewhat longer rivers. What we find is that there is a lot of movement of fish in amongst these lakes. What we have been doing primarily is managing them on a lake-by-lake basis. What we realize is that because of the interconnectedness of these lakes and of the populations that live in them, we need to consider them as a whole. So that's what we're considering by this ecosystem and watershed-based management—you're looking at the interconnectedness of the species and the populations that you're managing.
I was wondering if you could clarify the second part of your question in terms of our relationship with DFO. Would you like to know just in general the sort of division of labour, if you will, between the governments, or did you have a more specific question?