I understand that, but there were a couple of things I wanted to say, Mr. Chairman, as I know this will be an item that we will be moving on to.
I want to make a couple of points as they relate to the whole question of the routine motions. I know it has been the practice, and will undoubtedly be the practice in this case, that we will be looking at and probably adopting as is the routine motions we've passed before.
I want to raise a couple of small issues, and I hope we'll have the opportunity to talk about them when we get to it.
We've agreed that when documents are being distributed, for example, they will be distributed to members of the committee only when such documents exist in both official languages. I think we've upheld that practice on a routine basis and I'm pleased with it.
There is one weakness that we may get to in that regard, related to document distribution, and that is that whenever an order in council appointment or a certificate of nomination for appointment is referred to the committee. We've had this happen on a few occasions. I want to ensure, Mr. Chair, that pursuant to Standing Order 111(4), the clerk shall obtain a copy of the corresponding curriculum vitae for distribution to all members of the committee.
With any of the appointments made under the auspices of our committee, it's important that we be made aware of who these individuals are and that we take the opportunity to review them. We will of course decide this by a vote. But at the very least I am asking—and will be asking when we get to that item—that we get the CV of each one of those members. That will help us.
It has happened before that we say, well, we know who this person is and we don't necessarily need to bring that person forward. But we'll know this a lot better if we have an opportunity to see their CV.
Mr. Chairman, when we get to the routine motions, there's an item that we have talked about before that has to do with the whole question of in camera meetings. We think it's extremely important that there be some restrictions on the whole question of in camera meetings. It has frankly gotten a little bit out of hand, I would argue, and we'll want to make that argument when we get into that discussion.
I want to suggest, and I'll raise it with you now, that we hope we'll be able to have the opportunity to discuss the merits of adding to the routine motion, as it relates to in camera meetings, that the committee may meet in camera only for the purposes of discussing the following: (a) wages, salaries, and other employee benefits; (b) contracts and contract negotiations; (c) labour relations and personnel matters; (d) a draft report; and (e) briefings concerning national security. And finally, we would also add that all votes taken in camera should be recorded in the Minutes of Proceedings, including how each member voted when recorded votes are requested. As you will recall, Mr. Chairman, all that's recorded in the minutes is whether a vote passes or doesn't pass—a vote to go in camera or the result of a vote when we're in camera.
I'm trying to suggest that we put some parameters around the use of in camera meetings. I think it will be more helpful for us. Also, I think it's important that all votes taken in camera be recorded in the Minutes of Proceedings, including how each member voted when recorded votes are requested. I think that's important. It would perhaps be unfair of me to suggest that from time to time the motions to move in camera are abused, but there have been cases where I've objected to it, and I think other members of our committee have objected to it.
So just to make sure that we conduct ourselves in the most prudent and productive manner we possibly can, when we get to the routine motions, I will be making those additional recommendations, Mr. Chairman.
Finally, I would look forward to the opportunity.... In fact, I would hope that we would deal with this today, that a meeting of the subcommittee be set forthwith to confirm our business over the next number of days and weeks. We've got a few important issues in front of us.
We had agreed as a committee to look at the Arctic, and we divided that up into two pieces. We had begun on the first part, and I think it's probably a good idea that we continue. I had the opportunity to visit the Northwest Territories this summer, Yellowknife and Hay River. It was an interesting trip. I hope we have the opportunity to pursue this.
I would add, though, that there are some other issues out there. The results of the lobster panel will be coming down shortly. The Cohen commission...it's a year tomorrow since the commission released its report and we haven't heard boo officially. I know Mr. Kamp has been in the newspaper a couple of times suggesting that the government is moving forward, but we've not had an official response from the government to any of those 75 recommendations. Let's not forget that $26 million was spent on a study that is not only important for the Fraser sockeye, but it's important for the industry on the west coast. It has implications for habitat management and good science and DFO practice right across the country. So I hope we get there.
There have been other issues that have come up over the summer with respect to marine safety—the condition of our coast guard equipment, the ability to get out, the whole question of what's happened between the station in Halifax and the station in Quebec in terms of handling calls, and handling calls in one or both of our official languages. That's an issue that's come forward that we need to examine fairly quickly.
With the replacement of vessels, some questions have been raised about whether that's going to happen or whether or not it's been put off for some time in the future. As you would know, Mr. Chairman, the whole issue of the CETA negotiations has been raised as they relate to the fishery in Atlantic Canada. It's something we may want to talk about.
I'm sure I missed a few things, but there are a bunch of things that we need to examine. We've been meeting quite often, and I look forward—I know my colleagues do—to having in-depth discussions and hearing from expert witnesses and other interested parties from across the country on these and other issues. I look forward to this committee working, and I look forward to your chairmanship, Mr. Chairman, to help us do that.