The other question was about Fisheries Act authorizations around pipelines, and our process. I'll just speak briefly to what we do.
Section 35 of the Fisheries Act basically says that no project, including pipelines, may cause “serious harm to fish that are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery”. It used to say that “harmfully alters, disrupts or destroys habitat”. Either way we are responsible for authorizing that harm. That is a process that we undertake. So there are authorizations regularly issued with pipelines. We did it before the changes to the Fisheries Act. We do it now. We do have arrangements with others, and sometimes it's provinces and sometimes it's other agencies. We established the standard that must be met to be able to reach that serious harm level. At the end of the day, it's the minister who issues the authorizations.
We've done it, as I said, often. What is often the case is if there is harm, the minister can authorize the serious harm, but there must be an offset provided by the pipeline company in this case, an offset to make up for the impact on fish habitat.