Right. We know there has been an extensive campaign in the European Union over a sustained period of time. We know the EU ban was preceded by a couple of country-specific bans in the Netherlands and one or two other countries before it was adopted by the EU generally, and that it has been a subject of great controversy and publicity in the EU by those who oppose the seal hunt.
With respect to the panel report and the appeal, the first panel report that came out in November of last year is the only panel report. There has been one panel to date. They took the information at hand, the submissions of the parties, the third-party information, and they wrote a lengthy report on their conclusions and their findings. That report was adopted. We agree with parts of that report, and there are parts of it we don't agree with.
The purpose of the appeal process we are into now—and there isn't a further appeal process—gives us an opportunity to look at the analysis and the thinking and the jurisprudence the panel members and the panel collectively engaged in. It also allows us to develop arguments as to where we think they went wrong in their thinking, and where they drew wrong conclusions.