Thank you.
I want to compliment the department on this work. In a previous life, I did stock assessment and I thought a 400-square kilometre lake was a big lake. But when I see what you folks have to do over tens of thousands of square kilometres, my hat's off to you. To come up with confidence limits of 25% is, in my view, truly remarkable. Contrary to what you may have heard around the table here, there are some of us around here who think you do pretty significant, important, and accurate work given the conditions you have to work under.
On page 7, in terms of the environmental conditions in the Newfoundland-Labrador area, it actually looks like a random walk to me in terms of that particular graph. Were these trends statistically significant?