That was certainly part of the question, but it wasn't the only question. Certainly, my understanding, from being part of the committee that discussed the motion that was before us, is that we allowed...not “allowed”—there's a majority on the committee—but we discussed at some length the wording of the motion and talked about the concerns that many of us had, and it was all about, frankly, the decision to allocate the cuts in quota the way it was done. We agreed that we would go at it in this way, but it certainly did not limit...looking at the science, because that was part of the issue that would lead to the need for a reduction. But another part of the committee's concern was how that reduction was being implemented.
Certainly, that was my understanding, as a member of this committee, of some of the information we needed. If you're not prepared to present it and to respond to it, then we're going to have to get other officials back, as far as I'm concerned.