I think it's both. I don't think it's clear. There was confusion in the policy as we went from 1996 to 2007. There was confusion in terms of who was in and who was out, and what the expectation was.
In regard to the Ernst & Young report you referred to, the province was distinct at that time not to have a review of the current policy, because we didn't think the current policy was accurate. We wanted a review, for Ernst & Young to look at how there could be fair and equitable sharing of this resource, because we viewed at that point we weren't where we wanted to be. We wanted to be part of the Ernst & Young report, but it didn't do what we wanted to do.
I think you should go back and look at that, because I do believe that in that report it talks about that there was a lack of consultation, if I remember correctly, in regard to moving LIFO forward and how it had changed. So I think it's important to take a look at the Ernst & Young report as well.