Sure. There are a lot of deficiencies in science given how difficult open ocean research is. From the information we received from DFO, they talked about SFA 4, where the biomass index has decreased by 21%; SFA 5, by 48%; and about a 33% decline in SFA 6; and 48% in SFA 7.
I don't think we want to leave the implication on the table that there are no good assessments being done, because the assessment at least was good enough to make those conclusions, and you all agree that the stock has declined and the scientific research that was done confirms that, so the science isn't all that bad is it?