Sure, but again, you said, and quite rightly so, that the more resources that are devoted to more accurate stock assessment, the better it is. But when people talk about the deficiencies in the science, I look again at the information available and the fact that last year, for example, DFO did 1,100 trawl sets and there were 233 vessel days at sea. I'm looking at the map of the trawl sets off the coast and there was a lot of work being done.
You're recommending that we need more than 1,100 trawl sets, that even with that effort, it's still not good enough. Is that what you're saying? Would that be fair to say?