Absolutely. That is the whole purpose of our intervention here. That third party validation system should replace...and in fact, one of our recommendations—I believe it's recommendation two, option B—is to remove licensed observers altogether. Let's not make this observation. Let's make it scientific evaluation of Canadian hunting methods.
It's interesting. If we all recall back to when we were in our earliest days of education and we were doing science, the basics were that you had to have the hypothesis and materials and methods. We don't see that in the observations of the groups that are currently out there. There is no scientific.... There is nothing robust there. It has been identified by the European Food Safety Authority itself that it was biased observation and it's not science.
The only animal welfare true science that exists is that which has been done and supported by the sector and has been supported by the Canadian government. We need to bring more of this to the table. We need to show the world that we take animal welfare very seriously. We take the conservation management of our marine mammal resources as well as our fisheries resources very seriously, and we're willing to have third party validation about what we do and how we do it and let it stand for scientific scrutiny. That is the most important.