Yes, the rules of origin was another long fight when it came to the fishery sector. We got a lot of resistance from the EU because when we had scenarios like the one you described, our bringing lobster in from the U.S and then processing it in Canada and exporting it to the EU, which we do, the EU would respond that this was a free trade negotiation with Canada and not with the U.S., so why should we give benefits to the U.S.?
Our response was that this is part of the way we do business. We operate in an integrated North American market in many cases and this is part of our reality and we need some accommodation. What we did end up doing was that we agreed to rules that primarily meant that for us to benefit from the tariff advantage, it has to be Canadian product going into the EU market. But for the main species of interest to us—and that does include salmon and shrimp and crab, halibut, lobster in various forms, herring, and sardines—we agreed to specific quantities where we would be allowed to import the product from the U.S., process it in Canada, export it to the EU and benefit from the duty free tariff environment. We did that species by species as specific volumes. That was a concession that we negotiated.