Let me offer a brief comment on that side of things. The way we try to deal in British Columbia with those issues is that—again, in tribute to DFO—the consultative process.... Last week I was in a process aimed at rehabilitating chinook salmon in southern British Columbia. I was there alongside representatives of the commercial sector and representatives of the environmental sector, and decisions generally were being reached by consensus in an effort to ensure that you're not playing off the interests of the total fish against the interests of individual groups of harvesters.
It's the same as with the mention of quota earlier. These adversarial quota fights aren't happening in British Columbia, with one exception that I can come back to later. Recently, because we went through a period when we developed, in the case of salmon, an allocation policy—which all of us signed off on, literally—we negotiated an agreement such that recreational and commercial fisherman felt they were getting their fair share, from the way in which the fish were being allocated.
On the second part of the question—limits—you pay for your annual tidal waters licence. That gives you access to tidal waters for a 12-month period commencing April 1—it's the government's fiscal year. You can then fish for all of the species that are available for harvest. The limits you can take are carefully dictated. In chinook salmon, it's a maximum of two a day, and four in your total possession—