The problem with the decision, from our perspective, is that it says there is obvious discrimination, it's not fair, but they justified that infringement based on the fact there was a moral issue. That's very vague indeed, and how would that apply on all sorts of other products?
That is a concern, not just from the seals issue. Obviously, it's a serious concern because we haven't got access to the market, but it's also a concern on a whole range of products. If you're using that kind of a logic—if I can call it logic, because I'm not sure I would agree with that—if you're using that reason, then it could be applied too broadly, and I think we would want to have that narrowed down.