If people want to change carapace sizes, for example, or if they want to change how they're prosecuting the fishery to capitalize on an economic opportunity presented by the CETA process with the European Union, we'll certainly be there to respond to that.
Generally, I think most of what's envisaged is that we will just have better access to the market that exists in the European Union. We may change at the request of fishermen, for example, if there is a way to get different lobster packages or products into the EU and that would require some changes to our regulations. We'd work with any group that wanted to do that.
I don't really foresee any significant regulatory shift to capitalize on the opportunity, but that's something that may come in the future. We're going to learn more as we play in that market more significantly. We have to certify our products going into the EU that they were sustainably caught. They want to be differentiated from anyone else's products. The products going there will have a certificate issued by DFO indicating that the product was from a legal sustainable fishery coming from Canada. People won't be able to counterfeit Canadian product, so to speak, and get it into the EU for tariffs or to take advantage of the opportunity in the market.
We're probably going to see a lot of demand for eco-labelling, as we already have. We have, I think, 23 or 24—