My question is from the perspective of the independence of the inshore fisher and the owner-operator provisions of the bill. This was the area where we heard substantive testimony from young fishers who are concerned that the model on the west coast is not protecting the communities that depend on the fishery, that it is not protecting the independence of the fisher, that there is too much focus on the corporate fishery, and that this culture is actually influencing whether people speak out on these issues or not, that they are intimidated to speak on this issue.
Could you comment on that?