Very quickly, the NEB has been assessing and regulating this for a long time. They have scientists and qualified people who have reviewed this over a long time and have worked with DFO over that period. One of the issues was that there had been duplication of effort in the past, and it's a recognition under the MOU that there are shared capabilities and there are long-term best practices. That MOU with the DFO is very important. It recognizes that the NEB does have the requisite scientific knowledge and experience, and it's also the life-cycle regulator. It's a nice synergy to have that, and when things that have material impacts on habitat go through that process, the DFO does get involved and it is assessed properly.
However, for the main part of what's done—which is known and has best practices—the NEB is very well positioned and has the requisite scientific capability.