Okay, if I can move on to another line here.
It seems from what we're hearing that the easiest decision for DFO or the administration to make is to restrict anglers rather than take other measures to address an underpopulation or an overpopulation of a species. Is that an oversimplification, or do you see that happening: where anglers are the first and sometimes the only ones affected by the decisions rather than addressing the seal populations, predator populations or, as you mentioned, forest practices?
Who would like to...?