Well, we didn't specifically talk about the Species at Risk Act, but it's an interesting idea to use habitat banking as a method of funding or providing resources for actually removing species from the endangered or threatened lists. This is definitely an opportunity that I think is worth exploring.
The other part of it that I wanted to ask either of you to explore with me is the notion of corporate citizenship. Not everything that a company does.... For example, I'll talk about the Buffalo Hills project in Alberta, which is a wetlands project in southern Alberta. Shell Canada put $6 million on the table. They didn't do that because they were required to through habitat banking for an offset. They did it just because they're good corporate citizens.
If we go down the path of requiring this through reclamation, remediation or habitat banking for offsets, I'm wondering whether we're going to diminish the desire of industry to also provide corporate citizenship, just out of their own goodwill, and how or if you see that being a factor.