I think there are multiple approaches to that. I think that today the proponent, a company like OPG, would be responsible for the offsetting habitat for the life of their project—for the life or the timeline of their nuclear power facility, for example.
In the case of a third party bank, in some cases you would be transferring that maintenance over to that third party. In the case of Quinte Conservation, they are monitoring the Big Island wetland on our behalf. We have a relationship with them to do that, and they are monitoring its effectiveness over the long term.
In terms of maintenance, I think that would be established through the agreement with the third party.