Absolutely. There are two things about that.
One is that there is an environmental assessment process that allows people who are impacted in an area to come in and voice their concerns and affect a decision on the approval or denial of the proponent's project. That's one thing.
That's exactly why I put in the amendment regarding the service area. It would require that the habitat banking activity happen as close as practicable to where the deleterious effect is happening, if possible in the same watershed. In the worst-case scenario, it would be my hope that it would be in the same province.
Again, it's under the direct authority of the minister. It's the unfettered right of the minister to choose where that would be, but there would be guidelines around it. That was the essence of my service area amendment. It's a good question.