No. Actually, habitat banking is common in Canada. Our amendments regarding habitat banking were for third party habitat banking—first nations, conservation groups—which can only be described as a positive advance.
The other parts of the amendment were the offset, which were discussed, and finally the service area, whereby there was a defined region where the offsets could be used.
For instance, a mining project on the Avalon Peninsula in Newfoundland and Labrador would not be offset by ecological remediation in Saskatchewan. It would be as close as practicable to the area, ideally, and within the same province. Right now the service area is all of Canada, and I think that should be given some consideration.