I would say right now no.
I've had the great privilege of working with this conservation group for 31 years, and that's pretty well from day one in dealing with this river. In 31 years I've seen a lot of changes, and I've pretty well seen science slip a fair bit.
I'm going to say there are two kinds of science. There's one that's studying the species, trying to better understand the species. But there's also.... I'd bring it back to probably more research on the individual river systems. I think that's the big thing we've lost probably in the last 10 or 15 years.
We need to be on the ground looking at particular river systems that are showing problems to better understand that particular system. That's not to take away from the science we're doing on the species itself, but we need to have people on the ground. We need for people to be out in the field doing sampling. That, I think, has certainly shrunk in the last number of years.