Sure. Just to be clear, Mr. Vice-Chair, the Moncton stuff occurred before the Fisheries Act, so it was afterwards, when the Fisheries Act was in place, that the meaning and force was given to it.
It is about people.
One of the great examples is the nuclear power plants. They don't have closed-cycle cooling. They have open-cycle cooling, so they kill fish 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and there was no permit given by DFO. As a result of the changes to the Fisheries Act, the CNSC is now able to give that permit, and gave such a permit last year, turning what was illegal—and something that was pushing the industry to move to closed-cycle cooling, as all other nuclear power plants in North America and around the world have been moving to over the last three decades—into something that was now legal.
Our group was at those hearings. We argued against it. We gave that example before the changes were made to the Fisheries Act, and now what was illegal at all three major plants is now legal.
That is one great example. I can give you more.