I'm just seeking clarification. We're in favour of looking at this study as well, but I'd like to clarify a couple of points.
Mr. McDonald mentioned snow crab and others. I'm sure he's aware that we did an extensive study on the snow crab in the previous Parliament. We travelled and presented a major report.
He also mentioned shrimp. Is that something you wanted to include in this study, the impacts on shrimp? Mr. Strahl had mentioned not only the relevance of associated species that are affected but that are affecting.
I'm looking for clarification, because I would ask if that's maybe a friendly amendment to include the words “including shrimp” at the end and its relevance to associated species, or is that implied?
The second clarification is, when was the last northern cod stock study done by this committee, if there has been one? Five years ago?