If I've heard the question correctly, it is correct that it's difficult to measure precisely the implications of the amendments in 2012 and 2013, because it was tongue and groove with the decline in capacity of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. You have to take a longer view on where we're going with the Fisheries Act to actually decide if that's where you want to be going. You can't just take the two or three years after its implementation.
Then the systemic kinds of changes that need to happen include not only the changes to the Fisheries Act but also the changes to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans' commitment to monitoring, compliance, and ensuring a robust collection of baseline data, all of the things that were struggling under the previous act but that were completely gutted, or very strongly gutted, under this act. You do have to look at both of those actions.