Sure. I hope, as Mr. Donnelly suggested, that you submit all of that to us, if you haven't already. That would be useful.
One of the things we've been drilling into during this study is the origin of the changes, mainly to speed up public works, to reduce administrative burdens, and to take a 3,000 project backlog off of DFO's plate. On the one hand, we want to restore some things, but on the other hand not necessarily lose some of the beneficial aspects of the changes that really had a lot to do with streamlining processes and perhaps reducing the triggers for environmental assessments.
Do you have any comments on how we can get the protections in place, but still have a more streamlined and nimble system?