Mr. Chair, there are four more recommendations.
The third one is that the standing committee reject as inadequate and procedurally unfair the process by which the 2012 modifications to the act were developed and brought into force.
The next one is that the standing committee recommend the following three specific revisions to the Fisheries Act.
The first is to revise subsection 35(1) to read “No person shall carry on any work, undertaking or activity that results in the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat.”
The next one is to reinstate the previous section 32, “No person shall destroy fish by any means”, etc.
The final one is to revise the factors to be considered by the minister in section 6 to read as follows: “(a) the precautionary approach and the principles of sustainable development; (b) fisheries management objectives; (c) whether there are measures and standards to avoid, mitigate or offset the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat; (d) the relevant terms of land claims agreements; and (e) the public interest.”
Mr. Chair, I think we beat the 10 minutes.