There certainly are a lot of diverse views, and I will give the example of St. Anns Bank. When those regulations were published in Canada Gazette, part I, we had a lot of feedback. The highest number of responses we had were from the ENGO community. They were highly supportive of marine protected areas and of the high-protection zone we have in the centre, which minimizes the level of activity that occurs in that zone.
There were other interests. On the east coast, for example, we have a lot of oil and gas interests, and obviously very active fisheries, so we do get comments around considering the types of use that could potentially be within the marine protected area. Some of those users have different requests of us and in a way they are competing requests, so we try to balance that as best we can. We meet with them, and we try to accommodate their requests to the extent possible, balancing the interests of others. In effect, that is why we have these multi-stakeholder advisory committees, so they can hear each other's views and we can help balance those views as we design the MPA.
As Jeff indicated, the design of the MPA allows for some zones to have some level of activity, so again, we try to balance the users' needs by using those other zones to accommodate some of the activities they request.