I'll answer in English if that's all right. The difference, I think, is that with marine protected areas and the other measures that we use for protection, the objective is biodiversity, and not just specifically that particular fish stock in question. So, yes, we would use measures to protect the health of the fish stock, but marine protected areas writ large are intended to protect the aquarium, if you will. It's not just the fish itself; it's the environment within which the fish lives and has its life cycle.
For example, in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, le banc des Américains is an example of where we have identified a sanctuary, if you will, for groundfish. In developing that particular MPA, we would create a core zone where no one would go. We know that's a spawning area for that particular species, so we would allow that to take place so that there would be a greater productivity of the stock. They're intended to complement each other. We use mainly the fishing measures to manage the particular commercial fishery, but the MPAs are intended to complement that and to create areas that protect the broader ecosystem.