I'm not well versed enough in terrestrial park planning to really be able to provide a comparison. What I can say is that, in terms of planning for marine protected areas, we do need to be thorough in terms of our consultations, because what is being proposed is something that is fairly permanent in nature. It's intended, obviously, to increase biodiversity, and so we don't want to allow any activities that would affect that objective.
At the same time, the purpose of the Oceans Act MPAs is to support the sustainable use of oceans. Therefore, any activity that is compatible with the conservation objective is supported.
I'm not sure if the tools that are used to create parks or other terrestrial protection measures are similar. I'm just not familiar with that particular methodology.