Thank you.
Mr. Turris, you stated that for a fisher in the west coast, the TAC is under-fished annually by roughly 50%. Why is the TAC consistently being set year after year at a certain amount when it is known historically that it cannot be achieved? What impact is that under-fishing by 50% having on the stock? If you set a TAC at a certain amount and you consistently only achieve half of it, then there should be some implication. I'm curious to see what that implication is. The stocks should be expanding.