With regard to your comments, we've had competing testimony given on the total no-take zone versus a protected area with a managed commercial fishery.
I'm referring more to the east coast, where a number of fisheries, primarily in the lobster and crab industries, are now marine eco-certified, and where the fishery is managed to the extent that there's no concern about the resource of stock. Also, these have limited impact on the companion fisheries that are on the bottom.
Could you comment on designating some of these areas as marine protected but allowing proven commercial fisheries to exist in them?