When you talk about unifying objectives in consultation with indigenous groups, particularly as an advocacy group, you have the freedom to take a very firm position at either extreme, but at the same time, you're trying to influence government. I guess the question is this. When we hear what you have to say, does it reflect a consensus or does it really reflect, as I said, an advocacy position that you want to establish very strongly?
On November 21st, 2017. See this statement in context.