I would argue, personally, that the MPA would do a very good job of protecting benthic zones, but I'm not sure that it would have a very positive effect on pelagic zones or on the sunlit zone and the fish and species that live there. I think this is why the argument is being made that perhaps MPAs' boundaries should shift over time. I'm not sure we're finding that right balance.
You did mention that you're concerned about some of the locations of the marine protected areas. There's a 10% target by 2020, and if it's going to be representative, then it should represent areas of deep water and areas of shallow inshore water. Have your fishermen had the conversation about what percentage of their boats they expect will be lost, should there be a 10% target achieved by 2020?