That's an excellent point. I'll reflect back on your comment about the prohibition and then the regulation.
The regulation that is already on the table with DFO is your position statement on fish mortality, as well as your position statement on existing facilities that govern energy generators. That's where we think some of this balance can be struck, on the regulatory side. We understand that prohibition is what it is, but when we get down to the implementation side, we think the balance can be struck there. We have a good track record in terms of our effectiveness in monitoring the impacts we're having on our watershed or in how we're managing the water in our watershed. We have effectiveness monitoring plans that get carried out every year on a lot of our regulated rivers.
Speaking specifically to the local jurisdictional concerns from the Minister of Natural Resources, it would take more time to answer that question, but absolutely, there's a willingness to achieve a balance from industry.