I'm going to interrupt here because I have one more question.
It seems as though there's an analogy to municipal land management, really. You zone land, and you accept only so much of something, and there you go.
Mr. Gibson, I take the point that you're concerned about the impact of killing a fish versus having an impact on a fishery, but I'm concerned that one fish becomes two fish becomes three fish, and before you know it we're now chasing a problem instead of being out in front of it.
Can you best describe an agreeable balance here? Yes, of course, an intake is always going to have an impact on fish, but talk to us about what you would be prepared to do in terms of proper measuring and monitoring so that the situation doesn't get away on us.