The differences between the actual interpretation of the act and the changes, at least for our sector in inland waters, were very subtle. Some of the biologists that work in our sector would argue that the current act is scientifically more sound because it focuses on the productivity of the fishery broadly and it allows accounting for the food intake, the quality of habitat, and so on, better than the previous act or the future act to some extent.
On May 1st, 2018. See this statement in context.