I would support what the other two witnesses have just said.
I would mention the other recommendation in the Cohen inquiry of splitting out the mandate of promoting salmon farming from the responsibilities of DFO, because it's charged with both. They have a conflicting mandate of conserving wild salmon and promoting salmon farming, which is untenable.
With respect to accountability, there's also a disconnect between the mandate to conserve wild salmon and the mandate to promote fishing. The wild salmon policy says conservation is the number one priority in resource management decision-making, but we don't see that operationally within DFO. The priority is fishing. That needs to be a top-down change in terms of priorities there.